China’s human rights: A panel stated that the US has to closely monitor the seafood supply chain in order to identify any abuses by China.

• Forced labour hearing follows investigation finding at least 1,000 Uygurs moved from Xinjiang to Shandong to process seafood supplying American brands
• ‘Comprehensive strategy for transparency’ urged as witness notes companies serving most of the US need not heed ‘Buy America’ policy

The US must improve its monitoring mechanisms to identify human rights violations in its seafood supply chain where China plays a key role, witnesses told an influential bipartisan panel on Tuesday.
The comments came at a hearing titled “From Bait to Plate: How Forced Labour in China Taints America’s Seafood Supply Chain” and hosted by the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, a group of lawmakers and senior administration officials that advises Congress and the executive branch on human rights and the rule of law in China.

The hearing arose after a four-year investigation by journalist Ian Urbina found that 357 of the 751 ships in the Chinese squid fleet his team studied were tied to human rights and environmental violations.

The investigation also found that, since 2018, at least 1,000 Uygurs were transported from the Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region to Shandong province to process seafood that supplied dozens of US brands.

In 2021, Congress passed the Uygur Forced Labor Prevention Act declaring that goods produced wholly or in part by certain ethnic minorities, especially in Xinjiang, should be presumed to have involved state-imposed forced labour and thus ineligible for import into the US.

In the first half of 2023, about US$587 million worth of goods were denied entry to the US, more than doubling the figure for the second half of 2022.

Urbina, who is also the director and founder of The Outlaw Ocean Project, a non-profit journalism organisation, in his report said the seafood industry had so far largely escaped notice. He believed this was mainly because major processing hubs in China operated outside Xinjiang.

“Seafood is … harder to track than many other products,” Urbina testified on Tuesday. “Between bait and plate, there are an inordinate number of handoffs of this product.”

On Tuesday, the commission’s chairs – Republican congressman Chris Smith of New Jersey and Democratic senator Jeff Merkley of Oregon – sent a letter to US Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas urging his department to issue an order to detain all shipments from Liaoning and Shandong provinces and to put companies employing Uygur labour on the UFLPA’s “entity list”.

“From fish sticks to calamari, these products infiltrate the supply chains of major restaurants, wholesalers, and even find their way into the meals served in American schools and military bases,” said Smith.

The US is the world’s second largest-seafood importer after China, and China is a global leader in seafood processing.

Just under 40 per cent of US seafood imports are initially caught in American waters and exported for cleaning, cutting and packaging in Asia and China, according to one estimate.

Speaking before the panel on Tuesday, Sally Yozell, Director of the Environmental Security Program at the Stimson Centre, a Washington-based think tank, called on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to expand and redefine its “seafood import monitoring programme”.

NOAA needed to add labour and human rights abuses to the definition of illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, she said.

Robert K. Stumberg, a Georgetown Law professor, called for a “comprehensive strategy for transparency”.

While the US government espouses a “Buy America” policy, companies serving most of the US did not have to abide by it, Stumberg testified, also noting that exceptions to the policy existed that could allow tainted seafood to enter government procurement processes

China Overseas Fisheries Association (Cofa), an industry trade group, said last week in a statement that Urbina’s report was “fabricated” and that it had found “no evidence of forced labour” after an investigation.

“Workers from all ethnic groups work in the same conditions, enjoy equal rights and equal pay for equal work,” the group said.

In response to Cofa, Urbina on Tuesday stated: “Whether these workers are paid or they tell auditors or the state media that they are happy to have the job is not relevant.

“Under US law, any use of Xinjiang workers is deemed illegal because it occurs in the context of a larger government run and coercive programme.”

Several American companies, including Lund’s Fisheries, High Liner and Pacific American Fishing Co, have already ended business with plants identified in Urbina’s report.

Lund’s Fisheries and High Liner both noted in responses to the investigation that they did not find evidence of forced labour in their audits but were taking action out of caution.

In additional testimony on Tuesday, Greg Scarlatoiu, director of the Washington-based Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, described the conditions North Korean workers faced in Chinese seafood-processing plants as “inhumane”.

Scarlatoiu urged further investigation into whether North Korean workers officially dispatched to China processed seafood exported from the mainland to the US.